REPOST: Why I Am Not Worried about Japan’s Nuclear Reactors

Since I am pro-nuke and I support the establishment of nuclear facilities here in the Philippines, I am reposting this awesome entry. And of course, to stop those frantic anti-nukes who just oppose nuclear technology with baseless nonscientific argument.

Original link at: I also took the liberty of inserting pictures (from Barry Brooks, see link below).

I hope that this post actually enlightens everyone that nuclear energy is our friend and NOT our enemy. 🙂


Thanks for your interest. 200 000 hits and counting, number 2 on Twitter as of 8pm EST.

Follow Josef on Twitter:!/josefoehmen

Short link to this page:

There exists a copy of this post on Barry Brooks excellent blog, where you can still use the discussion function:

This article refers mainly to the events of the Daiichi-1 reactor. The developments at Daiichi-3 seem to take a parallel course today. The explanations in this document will help you understand what is going on there as well. Stay informed at

It is also save. “Nuclear meltdown” sells papers. It is the same quality of agitative journalism that far right wing parties resort to when they try to tell you that all immigrants are lazy criminals.


If you wish to share this information, please link to this article. This is the place where Josef will (if he does) post any updates or direct you to the latest version.


I have to stop moderating the comments as my parents in law have come over to stay with us due to the fear of aftershocks, so I am sorry if that causes any inconvenience, or stifles any debate. I honestly didn’t expect this level of interest (its over 32,000 views as of 11:12pm Japan time)

Just a few comments. I do not work for the nuclear industry. I am an English teacher, from Australia, living in Kawasaki, Japan. My friend Dr J. Oehmen is a family member, and by far and away the most intelligent person I know. Feel free to believe/disbelieve whatever we have written. There are no conspiracies, however if you need to, feel free to make some up. They are quite entertaining.

Japanese readers, I hope your family and loved ones are safe, everyone else, no matter what you believe stay safe.


**original post below**

I know this is a fairly full on statement from someone posting his very first blog. It will also be far and away the most well written, intelligent post I ever make (I hope!) It also means I am not responsible for its content.

This post is by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston.

He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s nuclear industry. I asked him to write this information to my family in Australia, who were being made sick with worry by the media reports coming from Japan. I am republishing it with his permission.

It is a few hours old, so if any information is out of date, blame me for the delay in getting it published.

This is his text in full and unedited. It is very long, so get comfy.

I am writing this text (Mar 12) to give you some peace of mind regarding some of the troubles in Japan, that is the safety of Japan’s nuclear reactors. Up front, the situation is serious, but under control. And this text is long! But you will know more about nuclear power plants after reading it than all journalists on this planet put together.

There was and will *not* be any significant release of radioactivity.

By “significant” I mean a level of radiation of more than what you would receive on – say – a long distance flight, or drinking a glass of beer that comes from certain areas with high levels of natural background radiation.

I have been reading every news release on the incident since the earthquake. There has not been one single (!) report that was accurate and free of errors (and part of that problem is also a weakness in the Japanese crisis communication). By “not free of errors” I do not refer to tendentious anti-nuclear journalism – that is quite normal these days. By “not free of errors” I mean blatant errors regarding physics and natural law, as well as gross misinterpretation of facts, due to an obvious lack of fundamental and basic understanding of the way nuclear reactors are build and operated. I have read a 3 page report on CNN where every single paragraph contained an error.

We will have to cover some fundamentals, before we get into what is going on.

Construction of the Fukushima nuclear power plants

The plants at Fukushima are so called Boiling Water Reactors, or BWR for short. Boiling Water Reactors are similar to a pressure cooker. The nuclear fuel heats water, the water boils and creates steam, the steam then drives turbines that create the electricity, and the steam is then cooled and condensed back to water, and the water send back to be heated by the nuclear fuel. The pressure cooker operates at about 250 °C.

The nuclear fuel is uranium oxide. Uranium oxide is a ceramic with a very high melting point of about 3000 °C. The fuel is manufactured in pellets (think little cylinders the size of Lego bricks). Those pieces are then put into a long tube made of Zircaloy with a melting point of 2200 °C, and sealed tight. The assembly is called a fuel rod. These fuel rods are then put together to form larger packages, and a number of these packages are then put into the reactor. All these packages together are referred to as “the core”.

The Zircaloy casing is the first containment. It separates the radioactive fuel from the rest of the world.

The core is then placed in the “pressure vessels”. That is the pressure cooker we talked about before. The pressure vessels is the second containment. This is one sturdy piece of a pot, designed to safely contain the core for temperatures several hundred °C. That covers the scenarios where cooling can be restored at some point.

The entire “hardware” of the nuclear reactor – the pressure vessel and all pipes, pumps, coolant (water) reserves, are then encased in the third containment. The third containment is a hermetically (air tight) sealed, very thick bubble of the strongest steel and concrete. The third containment is designed, built and tested for one single purpose: To contain, indefinitely, a complete core meltdown. For that purpose, a large and thick concrete basin is cast under the pressure vessel (the second containment), all inside the third containment. This is the so-called “core catcher”. If the core melts and the pressure vessel bursts (and eventually melts), it will catch the molten fuel and everything else. It is typically built in such a way that the nuclear fuel will be spread out, so it can cool down.

This third containment is then surrounded by the reactor building. The reactor building is an outer shell that is supposed to keep the weather out, but nothing in. (this is the part that was damaged in the explosion, but more to that later).

Fundamentals of nuclear reactions

The uranium fuel generates heat by nuclear fission. Big uranium atoms are split into smaller atoms. That generates heat plus neutrons (one of the particles that forms an atom). When the neutron hits another uranium atom, that splits, generating more neutrons and so on. That is called the nuclear chain reaction.

Now, just packing a lot of fuel rods next to each other would quickly lead to overheating and after about 45 minutes to a melting of the fuel rods. It is worth mentioning at this point that the nuclear fuel in a reactor can *never* cause a nuclear explosion the type of a nuclear bomb. Building a nuclear bomb is actually quite difficult (ask Iran). In Chernobyl, the explosion was caused by excessive pressure buildup, hydrogen explosion and rupture of all containments, propelling molten core material into the environment (a “dirty bomb”). Why that did not and will not happen in Japan, further below.

In order to control the nuclear chain reaction, the reactor operators use so-called “control rods”. The control rods absorb the neutrons and kill the chain reaction instantaneously. A nuclear reactor is built in such a way, that when operating normally, you take out all the control rods. The coolant water then takes away the heat (and converts it into steam and electricity) at the same rate as the core produces it. And you have a lot of leeway around the standard operating point of 250°C.

The challenge is that after inserting the rods and stopping the chain reaction, the core still keeps producing heat. The uranium “stopped” the chain reaction. But a number of intermediate radioactive elements are created by the uranium during its fission process, most notably Cesium and Iodine isotopes, i.e. radioactive versions of these elements that will eventually split up into smaller atoms and not be radioactive anymore. Those elements keep decaying and producing heat. Because they are not regenerated any longer from the uranium (the uranium stopped decaying after the control rods were put in), they get less and less, and so the core cools down over a matter of days, until those intermediate radioactive elements are used up.

This residual heat is causing the headaches right now.

So the first “type” of radioactive material is the uranium in the fuel rods, plus the intermediate radioactive elements that the uranium splits into, also inside the fuel rod (Cesium and Iodine).

There is a second type of radioactive material created, outside the fuel rods. The big main difference up front: Those radioactive materials have a very short half-life, that means that they decay very fast and split into non-radioactive materials. By fast I mean seconds. So if these radioactive materials are released into the environment, yes, radioactivity was released, but no, it is not dangerous, at all. Why? By the time you spelled “R-A-D-I-O-N-U-C-L-I-D-E”, they will be harmless, because they will have split up into non radioactive elements. Those radioactive elements are N-16, the radioactive isotope (or version) of nitrogen (air). The others are noble gases such as Argon. But where do they come from? When the uranium splits, it generates a neutron (see above). Most of these neutrons will hit other uranium atoms and keep the nuclear chain reaction going. But some will leave the fuel rod and hit the water molecules, or the air that is in the water. Then, a non-radioactive element can “capture” the neutron. It becomes radioactive. As described above, it will quickly (seconds) get rid again of the neutron to return to its former beautiful self.

This second “type” of radiation is very important when we talk about the radioactivity being released into the environment later on.

What happened at Fukushima

I will try to summarize the main facts. The earthquake that hit Japan was 5 times more powerful than the worst earthquake the nuclear power plant was built for (the Richter scale works logarithmically; the difference between the 8.2 that the plants were built for and the 8.9 that happened is 5 times, not 0.7). So the first hooray for Japanese engineering, everything held up.

When the earthquake hit with 8.9, the nuclear reactors all went into automatic shutdown. Within seconds after the earthquake started, the control rods had been inserted into the core and nuclear chain reaction of the uranium stopped. Now, the cooling system has to carry away the residual heat. The residual heat load is about 3% of the heat load under normal operating conditions.

The earthquake destroyed the external power supply of the nuclear reactor. That is one of the most serious accidents for a nuclear power plant, and accordingly, a “plant black out” receives a lot of attention when designing backup systems. The power is needed to keep the coolant pumps working. Since the power plant had been shut down, it cannot produce any electricity by itself any more.

Things were going well for an hour. One set of multiple sets of emergency Diesel power generators kicked in and provided the electricity that was needed. Then the Tsunami came, much bigger than people had expected when building the power plant (see above, factor 7). The tsunami took out all multiple sets of backup Diesel generators.

When designing a nuclear power plant, engineers follow a philosophy called “Defense of Depth”. That means that you first build everything to withstand the worst catastrophe you can imagine, and then design the plant in such a way that it can still handle one system failure (that you thought could never happen) after the other. A tsunami taking out all backup power in one swift strike is such a scenario. The last line of defense is putting everything into the third containment (see above), that will keep everything, whatever the mess, control rods in our out, core molten or not, inside the reactor.

When the diesel generators were gone, the reactor operators switched to emergency battery power. The batteries were designed as one of the backups to the backups, to provide power for cooling the core for 8 hours. And they did.

Within the 8 hours, another power source had to be found and connected to the power plant. The power grid was down due to the earthquake. The diesel generators were destroyed by the tsunami. So mobile diesel generators were trucked in.

This is where things started to go seriously wrong. The external power generators could not be connected to the power plant (the plugs did not fit). So after the batteries ran out, the residual heat could not be carried away any more.

At this point the plant operators begin to follow emergency procedures that are in place for a “loss of cooling event”. It is again a step along the “Depth of Defense” lines. The power to the cooling systems should never have failed completely, but it did, so they “retreat” to the next line of defense. All of this, however shocking it seems to us, is part of the day-to-day training you go through as an operator, right through to managing a core meltdown.

It was at this stage that people started to talk about core meltdown. Because at the end of the day, if cooling cannot be restored, the core will eventually melt (after hours or days), and the last line of defense, the core catcher and third containment, would come into play.

But the goal at this stage was to manage the core while it was heating up, and ensure that the first containment (the Zircaloy tubes that contains the nuclear fuel), as well as the second containment (our pressure cooker) remain intact and operational for as long as possible, to give the engineers time to fix the cooling systems.

Because cooling the core is such a big deal, the reactor has a number of cooling systems, each in multiple versions (the reactor water cleanup system, the decay heat removal, the reactor core isolating cooling, the standby liquid cooling system, and the emergency core cooling system). Which one failed when or did not fail is not clear at this point in time.

So imagine our pressure cooker on the stove, heat on low, but on. The operators use whatever cooling system capacity they have to get rid of as much heat as possible, but the pressure starts building up. The priority now is to maintain integrity of the first containment (keep temperature of the fuel rods below 2200°C), as well as the second containment, the pressure cooker.  In order to maintain integrity of the pressure cooker (the second containment), the pressure has to be released from time to time. Because the ability to do that in an emergency is so important, the reactor has 11 pressure release valves. The operators now started venting steam from time to time to control the pressure. The temperature at this stage was about 550°C.

This is when the reports about “radiation leakage” starting coming in. I believe I explained above why venting the steam is theoretically the same as releasing radiation into the environment, but why it was and is not dangerous. The radioactive nitrogen as well as the noble gases do not pose a threat to human health.

At some stage during this venting, the explosion occurred. The explosion took place outside of the third containment (our “last line of defense”), and the reactor building. Remember that the reactor building has no function in keeping the radioactivity contained. It is not entirely clear yet what has happened, but this is the likely scenario: The operators decided to vent the steam from the pressure vessel not directly into the environment, but into the space between the third containment and the reactor building (to give the radioactivity in the steam more time to subside). The problem is that at the high temperatures that the core had reached at this stage, water molecules can “disassociate” into oxygen and hydrogen – an explosive mixture. And it did explode, outside the third containment, damaging the reactor building around. It was that sort of explosion, but inside the pressure vessel (because it was badly designed and not managed properly by the operators) that lead to the explosion of Chernobyl. This was never a risk at Fukushima. The problem of hydrogen-oxygen formation is one of the biggies when you design a power plant (if you are not Soviet, that is), so the reactor is build and operated in a way it cannot happen inside the containment. It happened outside, which was not intended but a possible scenario and OK, because it did not pose a risk for the containment.

So the pressure was under control, as steam was vented. Now, if you keep boiling your pot, the problem is that the water level will keep falling and falling. The core is covered by several meters of water in order to allow for some time to pass (hours, days) before it gets exposed. Once the rods start to be exposed at the top, the exposed parts will reach the critical temperature of 2200 °C after about 45 minutes. This is when the first containment, the Zircaloy tube, would fail.

And this started to happen. The cooling could not be restored before there was some (very limited, but still) damage to the casing of some of the fuel. The nuclear material itself was still intact, but the surrounding Zircaloy shell had started melting. What happened now is that some of the byproducts of the uranium decay – radioactive Cesium and Iodine – started to mix with the steam. The big problem, uranium, was still under control, because the uranium oxide rods were good until 3000 °C. It is confirmed that a very small amount of Cesium and Iodine was measured in the steam that was released into the atmosphere.

It seems this was the “go signal” for a major plan B. The small amounts of Cesium that were measured told the operators that the first containment on one of the rods somewhere was about to give. The Plan A had been to restore one of the regular cooling systems to the core. Why that failed is unclear. One plausible explanation is that the tsunami also took away / polluted all the clean water needed for the regular cooling systems.

The water used in the cooling system is very clean, demineralized (like distilled) water. The reason to use pure water is the above mentioned activation by the neutrons from the Uranium: Pure water does not get activated much, so stays practically radioactive-free. Dirt or salt in the water will absorb the neutrons quicker, becoming more radioactive. This has no effect whatsoever on the core – it does not care what it is cooled by. But it makes life more difficult for the operators and mechanics when they have to deal with activated (i.e. slightly radioactive) water.

But Plan A had failed – cooling systems down or additional clean water unavailable – so Plan B came into effect. This is what it looks like happened:

In order to prevent a core meltdown, the operators started to use sea water to cool the core. I am not quite sure if they flooded our pressure cooker with it (the second containment), or if they flooded the third containment, immersing the pressure cooker. But that is not relevant for us.

The point is that the nuclear fuel has now been cooled down. Because the chain reaction has been stopped a long time ago, there is only very little residual heat being produced now. The large amount of cooling water that has been used is sufficient to take up that heat. Because it is a lot of water, the core does not produce sufficient heat any more to produce any significant pressure. Also, boric acid has been added to the seawater. Boric acid is “liquid control rod”. Whatever decay is still going on, the Boron will capture the neutrons and further speed up the cooling down of the core.

The plant came close to a core meltdown. Here is the worst-case scenario that was avoided: If the seawater could not have been used for treatment, the operators would have continued to vent the water steam to avoid pressure buildup. The third containment would then have been completely sealed to allow the core meltdown to happen without releasing radioactive material. After the meltdown, there would have been a waiting period for the intermediate radioactive materials to decay inside the reactor, and all radioactive particles to settle on a surface inside the containment. The cooling system would have been restored eventually, and the molten core cooled to a manageable temperature. The containment would have been cleaned up on the inside. Then a messy job of removing the molten core from the containment would have begun, packing the (now solid again) fuel bit by bit into transportation containers to be shipped to processing plants. Depending on the damage, the block of the plant would then either be repaired or dismantled.

Now, where does that leave us? My assessment:

  • The plant is safe now and will stay safe.
  • Japan is looking at an INES Level 4 Accident: Nuclear accident with local consequences. That is bad for the company that owns the plant, but not for anyone else.
  • Some radiation was released when the pressure vessel was vented. All radioactive isotopes from the activated steam have gone (decayed). A very small amount of Cesium was released, as well as Iodine. If you were sitting on top of the plants’ chimney when they were venting, you should probably give up smoking to return to your former life expectancy. The Cesium and Iodine isotopes were carried out to the sea and will never be seen again.
  • There was some limited damage to the first containment. That means that some amounts of radioactive Cesium and Iodine will also be released into the cooling water, but no Uranium or other nasty stuff (the Uranium oxide does not “dissolve” in the water). There are facilities for treating the cooling water inside the third containment. The radioactive Cesium and Iodine will be removed there and eventually stored as radioactive waste in terminal storage.
  • The seawater used as cooling water will be activated to some degree. Because the control rods are fully inserted, the Uranium chain reaction is not happening. That means the “main” nuclear reaction is not happening, thus not contributing to the activation. The intermediate radioactive materials (Cesium and Iodine) are also almost gone at this stage, because the Uranium decay was stopped a long time ago. This further reduces the activation. The bottom line is that there will be some low level of activation of the seawater, which will also be removed by the treatment facilities.
  • The seawater will then be replaced over time with the “normal” cooling water
  • The reactor core will then be dismantled and transported to a processing facility, just like during a regular fuel change.
  • Fuel rods and the entire plant will be checked for potential damage. This will take about 4-5 years.
  • The safety systems on all Japanese plants will be upgraded to withstand a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami (or worse)
  • (Updated) I believe the most significant problem will be a prolonged power shortage. 11 of Japan’s 55 nuclear reactors in different plants were shut down and will have to be inspected, directly reducing the nation’s nuclear power generating capacity by 20%, with nuclear power accounting for about 30% of the national total power generation capacity. I have not looked into possible consequences for other nuclear plants not directly affected. This will probably be covered by running gas power plants that are usually only used for peak loads to cover some of the base load as well.  I am not familiar with Japan’s energy supply chain for oil, gas and coal, and what damage the harbors, refinery, storage and transportation networks have suffered, as well as damage to the national distribution grid. All of that will increase your electricity bill, as well as lead to power shortages during peak demand and reconstruction efforts, in Japan.
  • This all is only part of a much bigger picture. Emergency response has to deal with shelter, drinking water, food and medical care, transportation and communication infrastructure, as well as electricity supply. In a world of lean supply chains, we are looking at some major challenges in all of these areas.

If you want to stay informed, please forget the usual media outlets and consult the following websites:


8 comments on “REPOST: Why I Am Not Worried about Japan’s Nuclear Reactors

  1. You’re pro-nuke? Wikileaks said there’s nuclear smuggling going around the Philippines. That should make you happy. Joke :))

    I don’t really agree that Philippines should be nuclear. I’m not sure I trust the government enough to build and run a nuclear facility when it doesn’t show that it can effectively implement infrastructural projects without compromising safety over corruption. Then, you’ve got issues of educating and training nuclear energy specialists… where are they gonna come from? Expats? Tsaka how do you even secure nuclear fuel from falling into the hands of terrorist elements? Daming issues.. I’d be afraid to have nuclear energy at our current govt state 😛

    • Haha wow really? I mean about that nuclear smuggling? Haven’t checked on WL lately.

      Hmmm, I did not say naman we have to do it now. Actually, I don’t think nga the BNPP should be used na, since it’s so old already. And true, I agree that with out current government structure now, focusing all efforts on nuclear research would not be beneficial. I’m just hoping sana na lang the government will realize this as one important matter to tackle. As I was discussing nga kanina with some people, halatang nauubusan na ng sources of energy rito sa mundo, tapos sinabayan pa ng mga kaguluhan sa Middle East. I’m not pessimistic, but I don’t know up to when those will last. Pero for sure, nauubos na ang supply natin of fuel, so maybe baka sa susunod yan pa ang maging source ng kaguluhan. (or this is just me overthinking).

      Which leads me to the sad reality that SciTech is one of the government’s bottom concerns. I find that sad, kasi we’ve been dubbed to be developing na (not as a third world classification, pero actually we are doing good naman na talaga economically, at least some “layman” papers I’ve seen said so). At our local research nga we are trying to be competitive globally eh, I hoped sana sa applied sciences din. That’s were my pro-nuke stand comes in — sana kahit paano the government gives an eye to scientific research (remember our Nanotech class with Doc D dati about how poorly funded nanoresearch is?). Again, not in an-overnight fashion, but at least support it as early as now, I guess. We have good scientists here in the Philippines, the problem is how to develop and maintain them. I think that’s what the government should focus into. (In a sense, maybe the government has no choice na rin kasi, since it needs to address more pressing issues? Pero I don’t think this should be the case, considering we are in an innovative era na. I think SciTech deserves much more attention too.)

      Which leads to the nuke issue again. Hopefully the government can look into the pros and cons of building nuke plants, not by this decade, but probably in the next one or two. Vietnam, a fellow developing country has agreed na nga with Russia, why can’t we in the future? I think by that makakatipid din tayo. Though of course, with nuke power we have to exercise proper responsibility. Environmental issues, etc.

      But I agree with what you said, the first step is for the government to reorganize the systemic, systematic (sounds Th141? haha) structures in the government. Remember that Montejo issue na he had the former PAGASA scientist (sorry forgot the name) out kasi nakatampuhan daw nya? That’s something in-grown to us Pinoys already, as well as other practices pero this shouldn’t be an excuse not to change/undo them. Noynoy should find a way how to do this and fast. Hope he’s not all bark and no bite with “walang mahirap kung walang corrupt.” He should go out and weed out the evil practices already, with greater force.

      In summary, for nuke in the future, fix government structures NOW. That would help us in terms of energy and economy. (Haha parang postlab report lang ah.) 😛 Anyway, thanks for your points Evan! 😀

    • Philippine-level Gabbie, hindi pa rin. Hahaha. Hindi pa naman lumulutang ang bansang Hapon sa ibabaw ng Pilipinas.

      I have to scrutinize pa the latest developments. But I still think japan can do something re the worsening situation.

  2. I wish the strong re-assurances in this article had been correct. Alas we can all see now that they weren’t. I’ve written up a reaction to this article along with some analysis here: It will also be far and away the most well written, intelligent post

  3. I think the government has already looked into the pros and cons of nuclear power so many times, especially concerning the safety of operating the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant. The pros include less reliance on coal, more power generation… basically, fuel security for the Philippines.

    But is it feasible? Is it even ethical?

    On the question of whether we should do nuclear power or not, the stance of the Republic of the Philippines is definitely against it. I think it’s even in the constitution that the country will remain a nuclear-free state, which includes not having things like nuclear plants, submarines, and nuclear fuel (i.e. uranium, cesium).

    In my opinion, I think it’s not ethical to pursue nuclear power. While nuclear power ensures fuel security, it does so at the cost of human and environmental safety. Engineers and policymakers will reason that you can safeguard against nuclear dangers with stringent application of technologies, redundant safety measures, emergency training, etc. But that’s what people at Fukushima were saying too before the nuclear crisis happened! While it’s unreasonable to demand 100% safety from companies operation nuclear power plants, is the risk worth the benefits? At what costs and risks are Filipinos willing to pursue energy security?

    Of course, before any debate over nuclear power can even happen in the Philippines, the public must be educated about nuclear power so they can decide if the country will have a nuclear future or not. It would be unfair if a nuclear future is imposed on Filipinos when they don’t even know what it is. And if the recent widespread panic over radioactive fallout is any indication, nuclear education has a long way to go.

    Now moving onto feasibility: If somehow the government decides to pull a reversal of the nuclear-free provisions of the constitution, then they would have to amend the constitution, and subsequently, deal with resistance from various groups (i.e. private sector, environmentalists, church) who will be wary of the dangers of nuclear power, especially in light of past nuclear incidents like Chernobyl, Three Mile, and most recently, Fukushima. You can be fairly certain that nuclear power will be demonized by these groups. On the other hand, energy corporations (i.e. coal, natural gas, petroleum) might also be resistant to nuclear power because it would encroach on their businesses. Given the colorful and fierce nature of public opinion in the Philippines, I think a nuclear power debate would last as long as the one concerning reproductive health (but let’s not go there).

    From what I know, there are proponents of nuclear power in government right now. Their arguments normally revolve around the impending fuel crisis in the face of depleting energy resources too. But I think a nuclear future is not likely to happen in the Philippines because government has not invested in education and science. Talking from a socio-political perspective, the government is just far too entrenched in traditional politics of economic and social self-preservation of the elite that investment into areas critical to development (i.e. education, science, healthcare, agriculture) would just be far-fetched.

    I’m not trying to be pessimistic though… first step to resolving energy crisis is always to stir discussion. Haha. We need to debate not just about the technicals aspects, but also the social and political aspects of the issue.

    • Thanks for the points Evan, added to a perspective I’m not looking into yet. 😀

      If that’d be the case (ie ethical problems), I think the best way to come up with the challenges of energy sources is to look into other areas na lang. According to the ASEAN 2015 conference we just attended last week (as well as the IYC 2011 seminar at UPD), the Philippines actually has the most “stock” of natprods in the whole Asia, if not SE Asia. Even the West actually gets them from us daw. We should I think then look into them first, if the Philippines, like what you said nga is not yet ready for “nuclearization” (which i laso believe too). The only way I can see here is for the government to start allocating more funds to SciTech R&D. As to how, I have some suggestions but at the end of the day, it’s basically up to them. Basta sana kahit kaunting dagdag lang, most scientists (well at least those who I’ve talked to, young and old) feel they don’t get their salary’s worth here. In a sense, that’s another ethical concern din.

      Though I still stand that I am pro-nuke haha. We need to consider LOTS of factors, with the environment first in mind. Maybe not in this decade or the next, pero we have to at least start with the discussions and the debates now. I don’t think this is wasting money, if ever. More of an investment for the future. (And maybe, just maybe, in the courses of discussions, they’ll find other better ways to obtain energy sources, then oks yun di ba.) And in a way at least our people will now know that kahit paano pinapansin ang agham at teknolohiya rito sa Pilipinas. Kahit paano hah.

      Matagal-tagal na usapan ito I agree. But as UKG pointed out this morning, “kailangan pa ba natin ng babala para maging handa?” Same with other issues I think. Yes, the government already has many concerns as of the moment, but still, yan ang trabaho nya.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s